Programmatic advertising’s scale depends on trust. Yet supply chain complexity has made it vulnerable to fraud, hidden fees, and misrepresentation. Industry standards like ads.txt, sellers.json, and schain have improved transparency, but they don’t guarantee authenticity. Enter ads.cert 2.0—the next step toward a verified, cryptographically secure programmatic supply chain.
Why Standards Matter
Early progress
-
ads.txt ensures buyers know authorized sellers.
-
sellers.json identifies supply chain partners.
-
schain traces inventory back to the publisher.
These frameworks improved transparency but left gaps—fraudsters still exploit open auction systems.
The trust gap
Without verifiable proof, buyers cannot be certain an impression truly originates from the claimed publisher or domain.
What Is ads.cert 2.0?
ads.cert 2.0 is an IAB Tech Lab standard that uses cryptographic signatures to authenticate bid requests in real time. Each impression is signed at the source, making it nearly impossible for intermediaries to misrepresent inventory.
Key upgrades over earlier standards
-
Cryptographic signing of ad requests, not just disclosure.
-
End-to-end verification across SSPs and DSPs.
-
Alignment with Privacy Sandbox and other privacy-centric ecosystems.
Key Facts
-
The global programmatic market is projected to exceed $200B by 2026, making verified supply chains essential (eMarketer, 2025).
-
IAB Tech Lab’s roadmap places ads.cert 2.0 at the center of its 2025–2026 transparency initiatives (IAB Tech Lab, 2025).
-
Fraudulent traffic still accounts for 13% of digital ad spend (~$68B in 2023), much of it enabled by unverifiable supply paths (IAB, 2023).
-
Adoption of ads.cert 2.0 could reduce domain spoofing and unauthorized reselling—two of the most costly fraud vectors.
Forecasts and Trends
-
Industry adoption pressure: Major DSPs and SSPs are expected to begin large-scale testing of ads.cert 2.0 in 2025–2026.
-
Global regulatory overlap: Verified supply chains will support compliance with transparency requirements in markets like the EU.
-
Integration with sustainability goals: By cutting fraudulent and redundant impressions, verified chains also reduce campaign CO₂ footprints.
-
Competitive differentiation: Agencies adopting ads.cert 2.0 early will position themselves as leaders in responsible media buying.
Practical Takeaways / Solutions
-
Audit partner readiness: Ask DSPs/SSPs about their timelines for ads.cert 2.0 adoption.
-
Update contractual frameworks: Include requirements for cryptographic verification in supply agreements.
-
Educate clients: Highlight verified supply as both a fraud-prevention and ESG-positive measure.
-
Combine with other standards: ads.cert 2.0 works best alongside ads.txt, sellers.json, and schain.
Conclusion
Standards have always been the backbone of programmatic trust. But as fraud and opacity evolve, ads.cert 2.0 represents the next leap—turning disclosure into verifiable proof. For agencies and brands, early adoption is more than a technical upgrade—it’s a strategic move to ensure budgets reach real publishers, clients see accountable results, and campaigns align with ESG goals.
FAQs
Q1. How is ads.cert 2.0 different from ads.txt?
ads.txt lists authorized sellers, while ads.cert 2.0 provides cryptographic proof that an impression is genuine.
Q2. Will ads.cert 2.0 eliminate ad fraud?
It won’t stop all fraud types but will significantly reduce domain spoofing and unauthorized reselling.
Q3. When will adoption become widespread?
IAB Tech Lab expects broader implementation between 2025 and 2026, as major DSPs and SSPs integrate it.
References
eMarketer. (2025). Programmatic Advertising Forecast and Ad Tech Trends H1 2025. Insider Intelligence/eMarketer.
IAB. (2023). Invalid Traffic and Ad Fraud Estimates. IAB Tech Lab.
IAB Tech Lab. (2025). Tech Lab Roadmap 2025. IAB Tech Lab.
World Federation of Advertisers (WFA). (2023). Global Media Charter 3.0. WFA.
Share
